Below are some resources that can help you analyze the quality of a particular journal
Where is the Journal Listed?
Check to see if the journal is listed in one (or more) of the following major databases:
WorldCat lets you see how many libraries/institutions across the world catalog OA journal
How can you identify journals to publish your work in? To start, look at the journals you read, that your colleagues read and publish in, and at who you cite in your work. Is there a pattern to those journals?
When considering a journal as a potential place to publish, ask yourself:
You can also look at the Think Check Submit checklist, use a journal evaluation tool [pdf], or talk to the library! We can help identify potential journals related to your field, and offer a number of tools that may help you locate an appropriate journal.
Is it Predatory? A Check-list:
Signs a journal or publisher might be "predatory":
Is it Predatory? What to Look for on Publisher's Websites
When you visit the website for the journal, look for these red flags:
Article processing charges (APCs), were created as one way for a publisher to meet author or funder demand for open access and at the same time generate the income required to cover publishing costs (and maintain or increase profit margins). Mostly these fees are paid by universities or funding agencies via grants. Charges can be $500-$4,000, or more.
Some publishers may waive the fee if asked for those in developing economies - no harm in asking. Also, some scholars may not be associated with a university or may be early career without resources for covering these charges.
OA advocates generally object to hybrid journals where only the articles whose authors have paid their APCs are open, (instead of the whole journal) and the rest of the articles are then toll, that is, by subscription. This practice is called "double-dipping" as institutions may land up paying for the content more than once. APCs are determined after an article is accepted for publication/post-peer-review, and should not be confused with submission fees.
APCs were meant to level the playing field particularly for scholars in disciplines where grant funding is unavailable, or for junior faculty without grants. It is questionable if shifting the burden to authors or their universities to pay for open access publishing is a sustainable model, or in the spirit of equitable access and worldwide dissemination of research results.
Compact for Open-Access Publishing Equity (COPE) was an early promoter for the creation of open access article publishing funds at universities to cover reasonable article processing fees for articles that have been accepted for publication in eligible open-access, peer-reviewed journals when funds from any other source were unavailable.
Beasley, Gerald. Article processing charges: A new route to open access? ELPUB 2016: the 20th International Conference on Electronic Publishing Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas 7–9 June 2016 in Göttingen, Germany. [questions whether APCs are the right model for changing the scholarly publishing to be more open and equitable]